Introduction
For years, SaaS sales development leaders have relied on Close as a foundational tool for high-volume outreach. Its native power dialer and straightforward interface made it a staple for scaling teams. However, the demands of modern sales have evolved dramatically.
Streamline your software evaluation process
High-velocity SDR teams now require more than just basic click-to-call functionality and simple email sequencing. With recent FCC regulations strictly governing AI-generated voice and automated dialing, alongside the critical shift toward "Human-in-the-loop" AI personalization, sales leaders are demanding sophisticated multi-channel orchestration.
While Close remains a capable platform, many decision-makers are finding that its architecture struggles to support complex RevOps stacks, and its pricing model becomes prohibitive as non-sales headcount grows.
If you are evaluating your tech stack and looking for a more robust, scalable, or specialized solution, you are in the right place.
This guide breaks down the top Close competitors, comparing native telephony latency, AI-driven conversation intelligence, migration complexity, and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) to help you choose the exact right tool for your high-volume sales team.
Software Covered in this Article
To help you understand CRM software in the right context, this article refers to a carefully curated set of leading CRM alternatives:
Quick Comparison: Top 12 Close Alternatives at a Glance
Tool | Best For | Pricing | Key Featu |
Outreach | Large-Scale Sales Engagement | Custom (Enterprise) | Advanced orchestration, AI sentiment analysis, complex lead routing |
Salesloft | Multi-Channel Prospecting | Custom (Enterprise) | Real-time AI voice coaching, cadence management, deep SFDC sync |
HubSpot | All-in-One Sales Alignment | $15 - $150+/user/mo | 1,500+ integrations, predictive deal scoring, unified customer journey |
Salesforce | Complex Enterprise Customization | $25 - $550/user/mo | Unmatched RBAC, Agentforce Sales AI, limitless API extensibility |
Apollo.io | Integrated Data and Prospecting | Free - $149/user/mo | 275M+ B2B database, native dialer, eliminates CSV exports |
Salesflare | Automated Tracking and SMB SaaS | $39 - $124/user/mo | Zero-touch data entry, native email tracking, automated timeline logging |
Pipedrive | Visual Pipeline Management | $19 - $89/user/mo | 400+ integrations, activity-based selling, highly customizable stages |
Nutshell | Collaborative Team Selling | $19 - $89/user/mo | Sneaky powerful sequencing, team collaboration, pipeline automation |
Freshsales | AI-Powered Lead Scoring | $10 - $64/user/mo | Freddy AI insights, built-in phone (Freshcaller), budget-friendly scaling |
Zoho CRM | Customization on a Budget | $14 - $35/user/mo | Omnichannel communication, Canvas UI builder, extensive Zoho ecosystem |
Yesware | Lightweight Email Outreach | $19 - $85/user/mo | Inbox extension, attachment tracking, basic multi-channel campaigns |
PipelinePRO | End-to-End Funnel Visibility | $67/mo (Flat) | Unlimited funnels, integrated SMS/email, agency-friendly dashboard |
*Note: All prices shown reflect typical monthly billing. Vendors often offer lower pricing for annual commitments, but those discounts are excluded here for easier comparison. Actual costs may vary depending on your requirements, usage volumes, and negotiated terms.
Boost your outreach efficiency—compare Close alternatives for free on AuthenCIO.
Why High-Volume Sales Teams are Switching from Close
Before diving into the specific alternatives, it is crucial to understand the technical and financial catalysts driving SaaS sales leaders away from Close.
While its built-in VoIP is convenient, growing teams frequently hit several operational walls.
1. The Pricing Wall at Scale
Close's per-user pricing ranges from $99 to $139 per user per month on its higher tiers. While this is justifiable for a quota-carrying SDR utilizing the power dialer daily, it becomes prohibitively expensive when adding seats for RevOps analysts, sales managers, or customer success representatives who only need basic CRM access.
Alternatives with tiered permission pricing or modular add-ons offer a significantly lower 3-year TCO.
2. Reporting and Revenue Attribution Limitations
Modern sales leaders require deep insights into "Activity vs. Outcome" metrics. Close's reporting can feel restrictive when trying to attribute closed-won revenue to specific outbound sequences or individual touchpoints across a multi-channel campaign.
Advanced teams are migrating to platforms that natively support complex revenue attribution models.
3. Integration Fatigue and Extensibility
Close handles email and phone well, but modern prospecting workflows heavily rely on LinkedIn touches, direct mail, and intent data triggers. When a CRM does not natively support multi-channel orchestration, teams suffer from integration fatigue.
Furthermore, teams managing lead lists exceeding 100,000 records often report database lag within Close's UI, prompting a shift toward platforms with higher API stability.
4. Lack of Advanced Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
As a sales team scales from 10 to 100+ reps, governance becomes paramount. Close's permission sets are relatively basic.
Enterprise teams require granular RBAC to ensure reps only see their designated territories and managers can tightly control data exports and sequence modifications.
5. The Shift to Parallel Dialing
Perhaps the most significant reason high-volume teams leave Close is the evolution of dialer technology. Leaders are migrating not just for better CRM features, but to access 3-to-1 or 10-to-1 parallel dialing capabilities.
Close offers a strong 1-to-1 power dialer, but teams looking to maximize hourly connect rates require advanced parallel dialing systems (like Orum or Nooks) which Close does not natively offer.
Methodology: How We Evaluated These Close Competitors
To ensure this guide provides actionable value for SaaS sales development leaders, we evaluated these platforms beyond generic feature lists. Our methodology focused on the specific technical requirements of high-volume outbound teams:
Telephony Latency and Call Quality: We assessed the infrastructure of each platform's VoIP capabilities, specifically looking at global data center distribution to prevent call latency when dialing internationally.
Migration Complexity Score: Switching CRMs causes downtime. We assigned a "Migration Complexity Score" to help leaders estimate the technical friction and RevOps resources required to move data, recreate lead routing rules, and retrain reps.
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): We analyzed pricing structures over a 3-year period, accounting for hidden costs like telephony minutes, API access fees, and the necessity of adding third-party tools to achieve feature parity with Close.
API Stability and Extensibility: We reviewed aggregated developer sentiment regarding how well these platforms integrate with modern RevOps stacks (e.g., Census, Hightouch) without causing database lag.
Find Perfect Software For Your Business
Deep Dive: Enterprise Sales Engagement Platforms
For teams scaling beyond 50 reps, standard CRMs are insufficient. These enterprise platforms focus on complex orchestration, granular attribution, and AI-driven insights.
1. Outreach: Best for Large-Scale Sales Engagement
Who is this best for? Enterprise sales development teams requiring complex, multi-channel sequence orchestration and sophisticated lead routing.
Outreach is a dedicated sales engagement platform designed to sit on top of your system of record. If your team is outgrowing Close because you need to orchestrate highly complex workflows involving email, phone, LinkedIn, and direct mail, Outreach is the premier choice. Its dialer offers advanced local presence and minimal latency across global regions.
Migration Complexity Score: High. Implementing Outreach requires a dedicated RevOps resource to configure routing rules and integrate with Salesforce.
Pros:
Industry-leading multi-channel cadence management.
Advanced AI sentiment analysis categorizes replies automatically.
Granular reporting on sequence attribution and rep performance.
Cons:
High TCO; requires a separate CRM to function optimally.
Steep learning curve for new SDRs.
2. Salesloft: Best for Multi-Channel Prospecting Workflows
Who is this best for? Mid-market to enterprise SaaS companies focused on standardizing rep workflows and utilizing real-time voice coaching.
Salesloft competes directly with Outreach but often wins on user experience and its integrated approach to the entire revenue lifecycle. Salesloft's dialer is incredibly robust, featuring live call studio capabilities and on-screen battle cards that trigger when a prospect mentions a competitor.
Migration Complexity Score: High. Requires careful mapping of custom fields and cadence logic.
Pros:
Excellent UI/UX that SDRs genuinely enjoy using.
Powerful real-time AI voice coaching during live calls.
Deep integration with Salesforce and modern data providers.
Cons:
Premium pricing model that escalates quickly as you add features.
Overkill for small teams under 10 reps.
3. HubSpot Sales Hub: Best for All-in-One Marketing and Sales Alignment
Who is this best for? Scaling SaaS companies that need tight alignment between marketing lead generation and sales outreach within a single database.
HubSpot has earned the trust of over 205,000 businesses globally. The modern Sales Hub is a powerhouse for high-volume teams, offering predictive deal closing and opportunity scoring. While its native dialer isn't a true parallel dialer out of the box, its marketplace features over 1,500 integrations, allowing you to plug in specialized telephony tools seamlessly.
Migration Complexity Score: Medium. Moving data is easy, but optimizing HubSpot's workflows takes strategic planning.
Pros:
Unmatched alignment between marketing and sales data.
Extensive marketplace with 1,500+ integrations.
Highly scalable from startup to enterprise.
Cons:
Pricing scales steeply as you add features and enterprise seats.
Requires third-party integrations for true high-volume power dialing.
4. Salesforce: Best for Complex Enterprise Customization
Who is this best for? Large enterprise sales teams that require limitless API extensibility, complex relational databases, and granular RBAC.
Agentforce Sales (formerly Salesforce Sales Cloud) remains the undisputed king of CRM customization. If Close is breaking under the weight of your data or failing to support your complex territory routing, Salesforce is the inevitable next step. High-volume calling requires either Salesforce High Velocity Sales (HVS) or integration with tools like Outreach.
Migration Complexity Score: Very High. Requires a certified Salesforce administrator and significant downtime planning.
Pros:
Limitless customization and API extensibility.
Unmatched reporting, dashboarding, and revenue attribution.
Enterprise-grade security and Role-Based Access Control.
Cons:
Extremely high 3-year TCO when factoring in implementation costs.
Clunky UI for reps unless heavily customized by a developer.
5. Apollo.io: Best for Integrated Data and Prospecting
Who is this best for? SDR teams looking to consolidate their B2B database and their sales engagement platform into a single tool.
Apollo.io has aggressively captured market share by combining a massive 275M+ contact database with robust engagement features. The primary reason teams migrate to Apollo is the Data + Dialer synergy. By consolidating your database and engagement platform, you eliminate the friction of CSV exports and imports entirely.
Migration Complexity Score: Medium. The challenge lies in adapting to Apollo's combined data/engagement workflow.
Pros:
Massive cost savings by combining contact data and CRM capabilities.
Seamless transition from finding a lead to enrolling them in a sequence.
Strong AI-driven email writing assistants.
Cons:
The UI can feel cluttered due to the sheer volume of features.
Deliverability requires careful management when sending high volumes.
Deep Dive: Integrated SMB Dialers and Modular CRMs
For teams that do not need enterprise orchestration, these modular CRMs offer visual pipeline management and automated tracking, serving as excellent foundations for a customized RevOps stack.
6. Salesflare: Best for Automated Tracking and SMB SaaS
Who is this best for? Small to mid-sized SaaS teams that want to eliminate manual CRM data entry and focus entirely on relationship building.
Salesflare is engineered around zero-touch data entry, automatically pulling data from your email, calendar, and phone to populate the CRM.
High-Volume Caveat: For a high-velocity SDR team, Salesflare is only viable if bolted-on to a dedicated parallel dialer like Orum. On its own, it lacks the native telephony required for high-volume outreach.
Migration Complexity Score: Low. The platform is designed for immediate deployment.
Pros:
Exceptional automated data capture reduces administrative burden.
Clean, intuitive UI/UX that requires very few clicks to navigate.
Strong native integrations with Google Workspace and Microsoft 365.
Cons:
Lacks a built-in power dialer.
Not suited for enterprise teams needing complex RBAC.
7. Pipedrive: Best for Visual Pipeline Management
Who is this best for? Sales teams that prioritize stage discipline, visual pipeline management, and activity-based selling.
Pipedrive is built by salespeople, for salespeople. It connects with over 400 other tools, offering significantly more integration options than Close for teams looking to build a modular RevOps stack.
High-Volume Caveat: Similar to Salesflare, high-volume teams must integrate Pipedrive with a third-party dialer (like Aircall or Nooks) as it does not possess a native power dialer.
Migration Complexity Score: Low. It is one of the easiest CRMs to set up and customize.
Pros:
Highly intuitive visual interface that drives high user adoption.
Excellent activity-based workflow management.
Cost-effective pricing compared to Close.
Cons:
No native high-volume power dialer.
Reporting lacks the depth needed for complex enterprise attribution.
8. Nutshell: Best for Collaborative Team Selling
Who is this best for? B2B SaaS teams that have complex, multi-stakeholder sales cycles requiring deep collaboration between SDRs and Account Executives.
Nutshell is a sneaky powerful CRM that focuses heavily on pipeline automation and ensuring handoffs between team members are frictionless. It excels in tracking communication history across multiple team members interacting with the same account.
Migration Complexity Score: Low to Medium. Data import is straightforward, but configuring automated pipeline triggers requires strategic thought.
Pros:
Excellent collaboration tools and shared communication timelines.
Strong pipeline automation features to reduce manual task creation.
Very transparent and affordable pricing.
Cons:
Not designed for pure, high-velocity "smile and dial" SDR teams.
Limited advanced AI features compared to competitors.
9. Freshsales: Best for AI-Powered Lead Scoring
Who is this best for? Budget-conscious teams that want enterprise-grade AI insights without the enterprise price tag.
Freshsales is a highly compelling alternative for teams looking to escape Close's pricing wall. Starting at just $10/user/month, it provides incredible value. It features a built-in phone system (Freshcaller) that allows reps to buy local numbers and log calls automatically.
Migration Complexity Score: Low. Freshsales offers dedicated migration tools specifically for moving off legacy CRMs.
Pros:
Freddy AI provides excellent predictive contact scoring and deal insights.
Built-in telephony eliminates the need for third-party VoIP.
Highly cost-effective scaling for growing teams.
Cons:
Reporting can be rigid compared to HubSpot or Salesforce.
Third-party integration ecosystem is smaller than competitors.
10. Zoho CRM: Best for Customization on a Budget
Who is this best for? Technical sales leaders who want deep customization capabilities and access to a massive suite of business apps at a low cost.
At $14/user/month, Zoho CRM offers a feature-rich platform that rivals Salesforce in extensibility but at a fraction of the cost. It supports omnichannel communication, integrating email, live chat, social media, and telephony.
Migration Complexity Score: Medium. The platform is vast, and configuring the UI takes time.
Pros:
Incredible value for money with deep customization options.
Canvas UI builder allows you to redesign the CRM interface.
Seamless integration with the broader Zoho ecosystem.
Cons:
The default UI can feel outdated and clunky before customization.
Customer support response times can lag on lower-tier plans.
11. Yesware: Best for Lightweight Email Tracking and Outreach
Who is this best for? Account Executives or hybrid SDRs who live in their inbox and need powerful tracking without learning a new standalone CRM interface.
Yesware is primarily an inbox extension (for Gmail and Outlook) rather than a full-fledged standalone CRM. It is perfect for teams that use a "Generalist" CRM but need the outbound power of Close for multi-channel campaigns.
Migration Complexity Score: Very Low. It installs as a browser extension and syncs immediately.
Pros:
Zero learning curve since it operates within the existing email client.
Excellent tracking for email opens, link clicks, and presentation views.
Syncs seamlessly with Salesforce to keep the system of record updated.
Cons:
Not a standalone CRM; requires an existing database.
No native calling or power dialing capabilities.
12. PipelinePRO: Best for End-to-End Sales Funnel Visibility
Who is this best for? SaaS companies with hybrid agency models or those heavily reliant on complex, multi-stage marketing and sales funnels.
PipelinePRO focuses on giving sales leaders a macro view of their entire operation. It is designed to replace multiple tools by offering unlimited funnels, website hosting, and CRM capabilities under one roof.
Migration Complexity Score: Medium. Rebuilding marketing funnels into the platform takes strategic effort.
Pros:
Flat pricing model ($67/mo) is incredibly attractive for scaling teams.
Excellent visual dashboarding for tracking lead velocity.
Combines marketing automation and sales CRM seamlessly.
Cons:
Jack-of-all-trades approach means some granular SDR features are missing.
UI can feel overwhelming for reps who only need a simple list view.
Key Features to Look for in a Close Alternative
When auditing your current CRM usage and evaluating these alternatives, focus on the technical capabilities that will actually drive ROI for a high-volume team.
1. Robust Power Dialers and VoIP Integration
If your team relies on high-velocity calling, you must evaluate the difference between an automated power dialer and standard click-to-call.
A true power dialer automatically queues the next number, drops pre-recorded voicemails, and logs the outcome with a single click.
2. STIR/SHAKEN Compliance and Local Presence
Answer rates are the lifeblood of an SDR team. Your alternative must strictly adhere to STIR/SHAKEN compliance protocols to prevent your numbers from being flagged as "Scam Likely."
Additionally, "Local Presence"—the ability to automatically dial from a localized area code—is vital for improving connect rates.
3. AI Conversation Intelligence
We no longer just want a dialer that records audio. High-volume leaders expect "Human-in-the-loop" AI Conversation Intelligence.
The right platform should automatically transcribe the call, summarize the key pain points, and seamlessly update the corresponding CRM fields based on the transcript, drastically reducing post-call administrative work.
4. Advanced Email Automation and Sequencing
Basic drip campaigns are obsolete. Your alternative must support AI-driven personalization at scale and automated follow-up logic based on intent signals.
With stricter email provider regulations, the CRM must support advanced deliverability protocols like BIMI and DMARC to ensure your sequences actually land in the primary inbox.
5. Seamless CRM Data Synchronization
Consider platform extensibility. How well does the alternative play with modern RevOps stacks like Census or Hightouch?
You want a platform with stable APIs and a strong developer experience to prevent database lag when syncing lists exceeding 100,000 records.
Try AuthenCIO
Move to faster, smarter software evaluation with AI
Final Verdict: Which Alternative Should Your Team Choose?
Choosing the right platform depends entirely on your team's size, budget, and primary prospecting channel.
If your team is >50 reps and requires complex orchestration: Choose Outreach or Salesloft. The migration complexity is high, but the TCO is justified by the massive increase in rep efficiency.
If you want to consolidate your tech stack and align marketing with sales: Choose HubSpot Sales Hub. Its 1,500+ integrations make it the safest long-term bet for scaling SaaS companies.
If you want to combine your B2B database with your engagement tool: Choose Apollo.io to eliminate integration friction entirely.
The Wildcard: The Bolt-On Strategy
For some teams, the best choice among Close CRM alternatives isn't a full migration.
If your only pain point is the limitation of a 1-to-1 power dialer, consider keeping Close as your CRM and "bolting on" a dedicated parallel dialer like Orum or Nooks.
This solves the volume issue without the downtime of a complete system overhaul.
Stop paying for features you don't use and interfaces that slow your reps down.
Audit your current workflows, calculate your 3-year TCO, and migrate to a platform built for the realities of modern sales development.
